Ambassador of Togo visits Adventist World Headquarters
L to R: Harold Baptiste (one of the GC vice presidents), Ambassador Bodjona, John Graz (director for the department of public affairs) and Eugene Hsu (one of the GC vice presidents).
On Tuesday, August 17, 2004, the Ambassador of the Republic of Togo to the United States of America, His Excellency Akoussoulelou Bodjona, and his Advisor, Joseph Sala, visited the General Conference headquarters.
The Ambassador met President Jan Paulsen who thanked the government of Togo for the climate of tolerance and religious freedom and the help given to the organizers of the Youth Camporee in Lomé.
A special luncheon in honor of Ambassador Bodjona followed the meeting with President Paulsen. In his speech at the luncheon, His Excellency shared that he was a young man when the Adventists dedicated their first church building in Lomé. He mentioned the important work of the church in helping the people of Togo and his pleasure in visiting the world church headquarters.
Adventist Representative Leads Debate on Religion Laws
Dr. Gallagher having a fun moment with organizer and founder of IRPP, Joe Grieboski.
Brussels, Belgium…
The contentious issues raised by religion laws in Europe headed debate
at an inter-parliamentary conference held in Brussels, Belgium on August
6, 2004.
Seventh-day Adventist Church representative Dr. Jonathan Gallagher both
moderated discussion and made a presentation regarding the serious concerns
over new restrictions being imposed on religious minorities in Europe.
“Our concern is that as more nations in Europe and further east
adopt religion laws that increasingly restrict the ability of religious
minorities to operate, freedom of belief is being compromised and violated,”
said Gallagher. “Religion laws are frequently counterproductive,
and may be used in some cases as a form of control and repression.”
As an example, Gallagher cited the proposed law on religion currently
under discussion in Serbia and Montenegro. “While no worse, or better
than many other such laws, the discriminatory impact of this law illustrates
the impact of trying to legislate in religious affairs. Sadly this legislation,
if passed, would make some beliefs officially recognized, with funding
from the state, while others would be termed ‘religious associations’
with much fewer rights. Religion laws need to be open, transparent, and
non-discriminatory.”
L to R: Prof. Cole Durham, Dr. Gallagher, and Prof. Balodis
The inequalities that
result from such laws, and the potential for discrimination based on religion,
were excellent reasons not to pass such legislation, Gallagher added.
Joseph K. Grieboski, president of the Institute for Religion and Public
Policy and sponsor of the inter-parliamentary conference, commented, “It’s
most important to have religious and registration laws on the agenda for
this inter-parliamentary conference because those responsible for considering,
drafting, and passing such legislation are here. This is an opportunity
for us to dialogue together and act so we can take the first steps to
prevent negative laws, shift current negative laws, and promote positive
laws on religious registration laws.”
Also speaking during the plenary session were Prof. Ringolds Balodis,
head of the department of Constitutional Law at the University of Latvia,
and Prof. Cole Durham, director of the International Center for Law and
Religious Studies at Brigham Young University.
Dr. Gallagher with the Romanian delegation.
The 2004 Inter-parliamentary
Conference on Human Rights and Religious Freedom ran August 5-7, 2004
and included over 20 parliamentary delegations from such countries as
Angola, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Italy,
Jordan, Korea, Morocco, Portugal, Slovakia, and Turkey.
The Institute on Religion and Public Policy, Inc., was founded as a think
tank and advocacy organization to study and understand the relationship
of religion, ethics, and morality to public policy, government, culture
and politics in both the international and domestic arenas.
UN Human Rights Body Hears Adventist Testimony on Religious Freedom Violations
Geneva,
Switzerland... The United Nations body dealing with human rights heard
testimony on August 2 from the Seventh-day Adventist Church on religious
freedom violations.
The UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights
at its annual meeting heard that "as an international faith community
representing some 25 million people in 205 countries, the Seventh-day
Adventist Church stands for the prevention of discrimination and protection
of minorities, in particular religious."
In a prepared statement read by Juan Perla, volunteer assistant working
for the Adventist UN Liaison office, Adventists cited the "beating
and harassment of members of minority religions, forcible conversions,
the burning of places of worship, stigmatism and discrimination in society
and employment."
"We believe it is essential to raise such terrible violations of
religious freedom at the highest possible levels," comments Jonathan
Gallagher, official representative of the Adventist Church to the UN,
present at the Sub-Commission. "Through our presence at these meetings,
we can heighten awareness of such situations and hopefully put much needed
pressure for action to stop the violence against religious minorities.
Most of all we want states to observe the right to change one's religion
without facing death threats or exile."
Participation at the Sub-Commission also provides the opportunity for
direct contact with member states and high-level representatives of many
organizations, says Gallagher. "Just as important as making public
statements is the possibility of speaking one-on-one with ambassadors
and diplomats about sensitive situations that can be resolved through
such quiet diplomacy."
The 56th session of the U.N. Sub-Commission opened on July 26 and will
end August 13, 2004. Established in 1947, its mandate is to undertake
studies and make recommendations to the Commission concerning the prevention
of discrimination of any kind relating to human rights and fundamental
freedoms.